Just a few questions:
- Who are the rating agencies?
- To whom are they accountable?
- Does anyone with a brain believe what they say anymore?
- Why do we still listen to them?
- Why aren’t their bosses in jail?

Geir Haarde: blamed ratings agencies for Iceland's meltdown
A couple of weeks back, I watched a BBC ‘HardTalk’ interview with Gerr Haarde, the former Prime Minister of Iceland. When asked how he got things so spectacularly wrong – allowing obligations accrued by Icelandic banks to jeopardize the solvency of the entire nation – he had a convincing answer. The ratings agencies said it was OK.
Last week, I watched some of Britain’s leading bankers hauled over the coals before the House of Common Treasury Select Committee. How did they screw up so badly? They sighed deeply. The ratings agencies, they said, with glum looks. The ratings agencies said it was all just fine.
I suspect these answers are broadly truthful. I doubt the bankers lied on oath, not when they had a way out. The ratings agencies, assuredly, got things spectacularly wrong. They told their clients that toxic slime was wholesome organic fertilizer. Perhaps they were genuinely misled. But the natural inference, in such a situation, is that these folk are shocking liars. At the very least, they should be required to prove that’s not the case.
If they don’t do that, what’s the point of taking anything they say seriously any more?

Many around the world share similar sentiments, but Icelanders currently believe they have more reason than most.