With the dust of 9-11 long-settled – the drama of that day now nine years in the past – things become clearer.
Dr Niels Harrit: a latter-day Copernicus
We live in a world of two principal political paradigms, locked in competition.
One paradigm attempts to explain the most crucial event in recent history with an open mind.
It concludes that the 9-11 atrocities could not have been carried out, as alleged, by marginalised terrorists on the fringe of power.
Consideration of a single aspect of 9-11 alone – the collapse of the THREE world trade centre towers – leads any open minded observer, once appraised of the basic facts, to conclude the official narrative is bogus.
The almost inevitable conclusion to be drawn by such an intelligent open-minded observer, once persuaded that 9-11 was carried out by perpetrators other than ’19 Islamic extremists’, is that agents of the State of Israel played the crucial role in perpetrating the 9-11 atrocity.
As in many a classic whodunit novel, the main accuser turns out to be the villain all along. The first-accused were victims of a frame-up. In the language of our era, 9-11 was a ‘false-flag’ operation: a Zionist false-flag operation.
The other paradigm is that the 9-11 Commission was broadly correct, that the collapsed World Trade Centre buildings fell as a result of fuel fires triggered by plane crashes into the twin towers – and that the perpetrators of the attacks were indeed Islamic extremists, members of an organisation called ‘Al Qaida’ under the direction of a villainous Islamic extremist, Osama Bin Laden.
