SIDEBAR
»
S
I
D
E
B
A
R
«
About this website

SydWalker.Info is a personal website. I live in tropical Australia near Cairns. I oppose war, plutocracy, injustice, sectarian supremacism and apartheid. I support urgent action to achieve genuine sustainability and a fair and prosperous society for all. I rely upon - and support - free speech as defined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (see below).

with the dawg

"Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers"

Blog Issues

Unless otherwise indicated, material on this website is written by Syd Walker.

Anyone is welcome to re-publish material sourced from this site, as long as the source is acknowledged with a hyperlink.

Material from other sources reproduced here is presented on a 'Fair Use' basis. I try to cite references accurately. Please contact me if you have queries, comments, broken link reports, complaints - or just to say hello.

Boycott Apartheid!
Boycott
Misc Menu
May 2013
S M T W T F S
« Aug    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
Search this website
Once in eternity the Good Lord swears
Aug 13th, 2011 by Syd Walker

One of the many terms that’s found its way into the lexicon of Zionism is “self-hating Jew”.

It the expression these folk use when they’d really like to call someone an “‘anti-Semite” – but they can’t get away with that because the target of their wrath happens to be Jewish.

For Zionists, “anti-Semitism” is probably the worst thought-crime imaginable . Ivory Towers throughout the western world, along with the US State Department itself in all its imperial splendour, have assembled large teams of grown men and women whose working lives are dedicated to combatting this terrible menace. They labour lest once again half a dozen million innocent lives are sacrificed in a frenzy of irrational, inexplicable, incomprehensible hatred.

I digress, but it’s struck me, ever since I took the trouble to become more familiar with the fables of World War Two, how debilitating the diseased emotion of “anti-Semitic hate” must be.

Allied Bombing of Northern Germany, World War Two

Northern Germany during World War Two. Having developed a far more substantial capacity for saturation bombing than Germany, the British leadership used it ruthlessly

Take Elie Wiesel, for example, grand-daddy of the surviving Holocaust survivors, a man widely admired as a Semite who, against all odds, survived the most anti- of anti-Semites at extremely close quarters and lived to tell the tale. As Mr Wiesel was, according to his own account, a resident of Auschwitz towards the end of the war, I wonder why didn’t his anti-Semitic German guards simply throttle him when they had the chance? They must have been too consumed by hatred to squeeze a trigger, or even use a karate chop. Hate like that must positively hurt!

More curious still, why did Mr Wiesel, again by his own account, choose to march out of Auschwitz with his Nazi guards – rather that linger a few days for the Red Army liberators to arrive? At any moment, one might have thought, a veangeful anti-Semite could have come out of his stupor of hate sufficiently to at least stick a pin in Eli or his dad. But no -  the lamb chose to troop off with the lion, rather than await the liberating gazelles. A strange decision, strangley vindicated by history. Here’s what he writes is his famous book Nuit (Night):

“The choice was in our hands. For once we could decide our fate for ourselves. We could both stay in the hospital, where I could, thanks to my doctor, get him (his father) entered as a patient or nurse. Or else we could follow the others. “Well, what shall we do, father?” He was silent. ‘Let’s be evacuated with the others,’ I told him.

It also occurs to me that if the warriors who accompanied Elie Wiesel and his sickly father on their march westwards were so consumed by hate that they were unable to actually do anything about it, perhaps that’s why Germany lost the war?

The British are a different breed.  Unlike Germans, Britons specialise in fighting just wars. Once at war, the Brits don’t mess around with half measures in a stupor of hate. They fight like hell – in a happy fusion of righteous might and mighty righteousness!

On paper, the British have started an awful lot of wars. But what’s truly awesome is that all these wars have actually been designed to keep the peace. The British often round up some of the losers they’ve attacked and put them on trial as “war criminals”. It’s a sport that was launched, in its modern form, at Nuremberg. Like many modern phenomena, it came about as a cultural compromise. Churchill apparently expressed a desire to “shoot the lot” of the Nazi leadership, but a well-known, rather shocked civil libertarian called Joseph Stalin insisted on the due process of a trial. And so it was.

There’s a direct line of historical and ‘moral’ continuity from Nuremberg to the attempt, currently underway, to arraign Muhammar Ghadafi before the International Criminal Court for his alleged “crimes against humanity”.

Once again, the British have started a war against another nation that was actively trying to be friends at the time. Once again, it is bombing the target nation in a one-sided delivery of massive carnage and destruction. Once again, it brushes aside all peace proposals and insists on its ‘right’ to keep fighting  Once again, it intends to put the leadership of the resisting nation on trial for “war crimes”.

There is, quite possibly, a special place in hell reserved for the British.

Hitler, Stalin and Churchill have all passed on to the after-life and we mortals can only speculate on their ultimate fate. But as a “self-hating Anglo”, I have my own theory.

Dick Cheney at the Pearly Gates

Dick Cheney at the Pearly Gates

I believe that in 1945, when Adolf Hitler arrived at the Pearly Gates, a stern looking St Peter inquired why he should even consider letting Adolf inside. He’d already heard that the applicant was the worst “anti-Semite” in history, a man who’d murdered six million Jews, then cunningly arranged for the evidence to be destroyed. “I was kind to animals” Hitler said in mitigation, but was forced to admit he’d suicided with his girlfirend “although we did get married first.”

St Peter shook his head. He feared there was no place in Heaven for the likes of Hitler… but after consulting with the All-Seeing Almighty, the former dictator was permitted to enter Heaven after all, where he remains to this day. Hitler’s main chore, assigned after taking his history into account, is restoration of the heavenly archives. As a treat, he’s allowed to paint heavenscapes on Saturdays and Eva visits often for conjugal reunions.

In 1953, another departed soul arrived at the entrance to Heaven. His name was Jo Stalin. He looked uncomfortable at the Pearly Gates, like a man who’s showed up at the wrong party. He explained to St Peter that, a confirmed atheist throughout his adult life, he’d clambered to the top of his God-hating party by being even more of a vicious murderer than his peers – and that he’d played chess with the lives of millions to satisfy his increasingly cynical geopolitical amibitions and lust for absolute power. He was a bit embarrassed about the show trials too. Stalin explained that if he’d known at the time that God was always watching, he’d have taken more care forging the evidence.

St Peter was very doubtful that Heaven was the place for the Soviet dictator, but did agree to consult God before an eternal decision was taken. After an instant’s thought, the All-Merciful took pity on Stalin, forgave his lack of faith, irrepressible deviousness and horrific misdeeds and allowed Jo into heaven, where he now passes endless time polishing the wings of angels in a state of astonished, blissed-out adoration. For intellectual stimulation, he also pusues a long-standing interest in theoretical linguistics.

Several more years passed. Finally, in 1965, Sir Winston Churchill arrived at the entrance to Heaven. He exuded confidence, but also seemed rattled. Winston had left his cigars behind. He was incovenienced by the absence of servants.

Winston Churchill victory sign

And screw you too, sir!

“I’ll have a double whiskey for now, there’s a good chap” he said breezily to St Peter, snapping his fingers in  impatience. “I expect you have quite a mansion waiting for me in there”.

St Peter was unfazed. “Who are you?” he asked. “Why do you think you should get into Heaven?”

Unaccustomed to obscurity, the astonished hero explained that he was the Greatest Englishman of all time, the Man of the Century, an audatious leader of the British Empire in several just wars and the champion of the entire Free World in the greatest conflict the world had ever known. As well as saving civilization, Winston concluded,  I’ve been an first-class artist, an accomplished orator, a brilliant writer, a great wit, historian, commentator – and a famous humanitarian!

At that moment God made one of His historically rare  appearances at the Gateway to Heaven. (In fact, the only other occasion was when He’d personally booted out The Devil himself, shortly after the Big Bang.)

“One question!” boomed the Lord of Lords.

“Are you a Christian?”

Puffing out his chest and pulling on his waitcoat tails, Sir Winston Chuchill explained that he was, indeed, a Christian. He was about to say more when a trapdoor opened and Winston Churchill fell shrieking into a pit, deep inside the bowels of Hell, filled with boiling meths in a choking, detestable atmosphere of stale cigar smoke.

The adoring Gatekeeper looked on the face of the Almighty in search of Enlightenment

“Are you not All-Loving?” St Peter inquired of His God.

“As It Happens, I do forgive most things” replied the Almighty.

He paused for dramatic effect.

“But that guy… is a fucking hypocrite!”

The Soxir Style of Reporting
Aug 11th, 2011 by Syd Walker

Libya continues to be hit, on average, approximately every half hour by a NATO bombing attack in a ‘campaign’ of wreaking murderous damage that’s been underway for five months and counting.

For me, one consequence of following the bloody events in Libya has been making the acquaintance – from a safe distance – of some of the western journalists reporting from Libya.

Tripoli-based reporters stay at the now-legendary Rixos Hotel. It’s an arrangement that seems to suit all sides, despite routine grumbles from the valiant ladies and gentlemen of the ‘free press’ and bouts of quite extraordinary paranoia (The Guardian informs us one ‘journalist’ refused all hot food, believing it to be spiked with sedatives!)

Importantly, as long as these westerners remain at the Rixos,  NATO can avoid the embarrassment of wiping out the entire western press corp by ‘mistake’ . That would be a terrible blow to the prestige of western humanitarians. Unlike their Libyan hosts, the Rixos set have real faces, real friends, real families and lives that matter.

The Libyan Government, for its part, can keep a close eye on the bastards while they’re staying at the Rixos. This is typically portrayed as ‘paranoia’ on the part of the Government. Those who make the claim seem to have forgotten how many German journalists were allowed to report freely from London during World War Two – and how the British State might have dealt with any who tried.

Ivan Watson, CNN

Ivan Watson, CNN. Spends most nights tucked up safely 'embed' at the Rixos

On any given day, a Twitter search for “Rixos” is a way of getting some idea which western journalists are in Tripoli and what they’re up to. There has been quite a turnover since March! It’s been like a soap opera for news junkies.

Ivan Watson, who works for CNN, is neither the worst nor the best of the Rixos crowd. He’s easy to tease because of his movie-star wannabee photo. But in fairness, one senses occasional attempts on his part to explain the full horror of what’s happening and even register a murmur of protest. Here’s his recent report, filed soon after attending a mass funeral near Zliten. In this unusual case, the articulate Libyan Government spokseman, Moussa Ibrahim, actually gets a few coherent sentences in edgeways on the tape.

Yet the lapse is only temporary. Ivan is back on track almost straight away – posing once again as the hard-nosed, sceptical, ‘can’t fool me’ style of reporter that his bosses expect… while Ivan is in Libya.

In case the CNN overlords send Mr Watson to London next, I’ve taken the liberty of writing his next story, using the same ‘Rixos-style’ of reporting – a technique that shows western journalists haven’t entirely lost the capacity for scepticism).

Here it is:

Ivan goes to London

Yesterday, travelling by bus with other reporters based at London’s Soxir Hotel, I was taken to witness dramatic scenes apparently caused by people the UK regime describes as ‘rioters’.

We saw what appeared to be many burning buildings. However, it was impossible for us to confirm these fires were, as the regime asserts, lit by rebellious civilians.

We also observed what did appear to be riots in progress. Some people seemed noticeably angry, but it was not possible for us to verify they were genuine rioters.

A massive police presence on the streets shows the isolated Cameron regime is still struggling to re-impose dictatorial rule.

Unverified London fire

A shop on fire in London, August 2011. Claims by the Cameron regime that this fire was started by rioters cannot be independently verified

A spokesman for the regime claimed hundreds of fires have been started by ‘rioters’ in recent days. That claim cannot be independently confirmed. Estimates of damage vary widely.

The only ordinary Britons willing to talk openly with us claimed to support the Government. I witnessed at least one surreptitious thumbs down sign. It’s hard to guage accurately the full extent of opposition to Downing Street.

The respected Tripoli-based ‘Committee for Protection of British Property’ yesterday issued a statement strongly condemning the Cameron Government for complicity in burning down its own peoples’ shops and homes.

“The world community demands that Cameron steps down immediately!” said CPBP Chairman Dr I’m-Ratha-Spooki, speaking by satellite phone from an undisclosed location.

__________________________________________

Also by Ivan Watson: In Libya – as always in war – civilians pay highest price (August 5th 2011)

Orwellian Britain now at peace with Al Qaeda
Jul 20th, 2011 by Syd Walker

Does Al Qaeda really exist?

Opinions vary widely.

Muammar Ghadafi appears to think so – and I take his opinion seriously. I’ve noticed Ghadafi  has been willing to discuss quite a few subjects – such as Israel’s likely role in the JFK assassination – that are apparently too complex or scary for other world leaders.

Yet on the existence of Al Qaeda, I’ve long had my doubts. Perhaps I can say I’m ‘agnostic’ about the existence of the greatest bogey of our era?

Quoting former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook, Cynthia McKinney wittily remarked that “Al Qaeda is like the CIA’s Rolodex”. I think that may be close to the truth. If so, Al Qaeda might also be re-named ‘Rent-a-Mob-of-Islamic-Extremists’.

A public hanging in Benghazi after the rebel take-over

A public hanging in Benghazi after the rebel take-over; Britain's new allies enjoy a night out on the town

There do appear to be a number of regionally-focused Islamic extremist organisations around the world whose existence is rather more tangible. Some of those groups may well collaborate from time to time. That’s as much as I’m willing to say I believe in relation to the existence of ‘Al Qaeda’, without further evidence. And of course, only fools think Al Qaeda was the organisation that planned and executed 9-11. In that case, its function was merely to serve as patsy.

Western Governments have been keeping an eye on actual Islamic extremist organisations for decades. The British Government has a published list of proscribed terrorist organisations (many, but not all, are ‘Islamist’). The list mostly pre-dates 9-11.

One of these listed terrorist groups is the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG). This is what Her Majesty’s Government has to say about it:

The LIFG seeks to replace the current Libyan regime with a hard-line Islamic state. The group is also part of the wider global Islamist extremist movement, as inspired by Al Qa’ida. The group has mounted several operations inside Libya, including a 1996 attempt to assassinate Mu’ammar Qadhafi.

Given this background, a recent report in the New York Times - Exiled Islamists Watch Rebellion Unfold at Home - is noteworthy, to say the least. Here’s how it begins:

Abu Sohaib spends most of his time online these days, following the news from his native Libya. He is in constant contact with friends on the ground there, helping them map out strategy to fight the rule of Col. Ghadafi.

“I would like to be there myself; I tried to go,” he said, pausing to look at the car keys in front of him. “But Tunisia and Egypt wouldn’t let me in even after their revolution.”

Abu Sohaib, his nom de guerre, is on a watch list for suspected terrorists not only in Libya and its neighboring countries, but also in some European countries. He is a senior commander of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, a former militant organization that once was aligned with Al Qaeda. The New York Times is withholding his real name because he said he fears for his safety.

Now isn’t that thoughtful? To help a man who’s active in an organisation that’s on the UK’s proscribed terrorist group list, the New York Times keeps his name confidential. So considerate!

It occurred to me rather odd the British authorities don’t seem to mind… until I read further and discovered the article is actually written from London.

‘Abu Sohaib’, in other words, is living in the capital city of the very nation that designated his organisation ‘terrorist’: His colleagues travel from London to Libya at will:

Here in London, Abu Sohaib and a dozen or so former commanders make up a rear-guard headquarters of sorts, with some members shuttling between London and Benghazi to strategize and share donations collected from the sizable Libyan expatriate community in Britain.

So there we have it! It’s not too hard to get the hang of this new reality. There’s not much to learn; not a lot to forget.

Repeat after me:

NATO is at War with Libya. NATO has Always been at War with Libya.

NATO is not at War with Al Quaeda. NATO has Never been at War with Al Quaeda.

If discordant memories of former enemies or old friends enter your mind, swig down Victory Gin.

 

#Hackgate rocks the palace!
Jul 10th, 2011 by Syd Walker

Will she lose her head?

At the Court of Saint Rupert, the tyranical rule of Queen Rebekah 1st is challenged by revolting commoners.

Rebekah Brooks

Queen Elizabeth 1st

»  Substance:WordPress   »  Style:Ahren Ahimsa