Just another blog about achieving global peace, prosperity and sustainability
» S I D E B A R «
Mar 19th, 2009 by Syd Walker
Spectacled Flying Fox: under the gun again?
When Governments change in Queensland, the consequence can be dramatic. There’s no House of Review. It’s winner takes all in the Legislative Assembly.
There’s a vibe in this election that the Bligh Labor Government will fall and that may well occur. Many people feel the ALP does not deserve re-election. They have a point.
But does the ‘Opposition’ deserve to be elected? Some LNP candidates are more attractive than their Labor counterparts. That’s a reason for putting LNP above Labor. An effective local member is worth a lot. But what matters most of all, in general, is the quality and approach of the State cabinet. It will drive most new policy.
The ALP has disappointed on many fronts, but there are intelligent and capable Labor politicians in Queensland. One of them is Environment Minister Andrew McNamara. This is what he said on Wednesday about the Labor Government’s ban on shooting flying foxes:
“The crop losses that were reported over this season were relatively slight, I acknowledge that some particular growers had heavier losses than others but it’s simply a matter of in the 21st century we have to go with smarter methods rather than blasting away at night with a shotgun”
Compare that with what Shadow Agriculture Minister Ray Hopper said, in the same report, when explaining that the LNP would re-introduce shooting permits.
I’m considering starting a new category, such as ‘Salacious Gossip’, to attract more visitors. For now, this item will have to be filed under ‘Satire’.
These have been the hottest talking points of the campaign. And rightly so. They are topics about which Australia’s Journalistic Class of 09 is capable of writing, chattering and twittering with ease.
Julie Bishop in the good old days
If I can’t beat the mainstream, I may as well join it. Here are a couple of photos of other leading Australian politicians in their youth. I seek no money… and publish only in the interests of public exposure.
Pauline Hanson’s persecution complex is unwarranted. She is not alone. I have dirt files on most of the sheilahs in Parliament.
I shall release bits of it over time to boost traffic to this site. But no naughty bits. This will remain a family website.
This is a local story, published first in CairnsBlog. It’s my attempt to make sense of some of this area’s history and politics, but concerns broader issues such as the justice for indigenous people and nature conservation, the coming Queensland election and News Ltd journalism at its most excreable…
_____________________________
King of the local hacks?
Gavin King writes opinion pieces, mostly political tittle-tattle, for the Cairns Post, one of Rupert Murdoch’s innumerable regional newspapers in Australia. His column in the Post appears under the pretentious title ‘The King’.
King seems to revel in cynicism. One suspects he’d rather be in Canberra, covering the spiteful wrangles of national politics and writing about egos as big as his own. But perhaps he can’t stand cold weather, or maybe he has parking ticket warrants outstanding in NSW? At any event, it seems he’s stuck in Cairns. And we, who live in Far North Queensland, seem to be stuck with him, along with his pretensions, crass opinions and naff attitudes.
Sarah Isaacs of the Barron River Greens
Last week, a media release from Sarah Isaacs of the Barron River Greens in the forthcoming Queensland State election began with the words
“The Greens usually welcome new National Park initiatives but find themselves in the ironic situation of opposing the formation of one on the old Mona Mona reserve”.
Another State election is underway in Queensland. We’re only ten days from election day. Not long to raise new issues.
I may be wrong, but I think there are two topics that haven’t yet been discussed so far in this campaign. They should be.
The London Bombings, July 7th 2005: no inquest or public inquiry - so presumably another false flag operation?
The first is terrorism. Today US Vice-President Joe Biden warned about ‘Al Qaida’ “regenerating and conceiving new atrocities” and named Australia as a potential target. Even though the ‘threat’ of terror may seem distant to Queenslanders, that’s not the way ‘intelligence services’ see things in Washington.
We should take note.
I suggest a one-sentence terrorism policy, that all Queensland’s political leaders could easily support. It would, in my opinion, do more to discourage new ‘terrorist’ atrocities in this wonderful part of the world than any other single measure.
The policy is simple: “In the event of a ‘terrorist atrocity’ – or anything resembling a ‘terrorist atrocity’ – in Queensland, there will be a full and comprehensive public inquiry to establish the truth, in addition to open inquests if there is loss of human life.”
No single policy would do more to discourage new terrorist attacks.
Had these basic measures occurred after the Port Arthur massacre in 1996 – or following the July 7th 2005 bombings in London, for that matter – we’d be much safer today from the recurrence of such events. As it is, the real perpetrators in each case have most likely escaped justice by now.
Geir Haarde: blamed ratings agencies for Iceland's meltdown
A couple of weeks back, I watched a BBC ‘HardTalk’ interview with Gerr Haarde, the former Prime Minister of Iceland. When asked how he got things so spectacularly wrong – allowing obligations accrued by Icelandic banks to jeopardize the solvency of the entire nation – he had a convincing answer. The ratings agencies said it was OK.
Last week, I watched some of Britain’s leading bankers hauled over the coals before the House of Common Treasury Select Committee. How did they screw up so badly? They sighed deeply. The ratings agencies, they said, with glum looks. The ratings agencies said it was all just fine.
I suspect these answers are broadly truthful. I doubt the bankers lied on oath, not when they had a way out. The ratings agencies, assuredly, got things spectacularly wrong. They told their clients that toxic slime was wholesome organic fertilizer. Perhaps they were genuinely misled. But the natural inference, in such a situation, is that these folk are shocking liars. At the very least, they should be required to prove that’s not the case.
If they don’t do that, what’s the point of taking anything they say seriously any more?
The Queensland State election has been called. Election day is March 21st.
This is not a comprehensive round-up… just a few personal thoughts.
I’ll start at the ‘top’. I rather like the current Premier, Anna Bligh. I’ve met her only once, for a very brief one-to-one discussion at one of the former Premier’s moving cabinet meetings. I was impressed. She struck me as a politician capable of actually listening, even to an unpopular message. She didn’t just give a rote response. She gave a thoughtful response. That’s worth a lot in my book.
Lawrence Springborg: lots of blue sky, but vision?
I’ve never met Opposition Leader, Lawrence Springborg of the Liberal National Party, but he’s been around a while. Actually, it’s his third Queensland election contest as Opposition leader.
I have heard Springborg on the radio and watched him on TV many times. He does not impress me. If he’s more than a reactionary opportunist, he does a good job covering it up. But I’ll keep an open mind and hope he can contribute to raising the level of debate in this State. Surely it’s his last chance to do that as Opposition leader?
Those are the two main party leaders. What of the political parties in general?