SIDEBAR
»
S
I
D
E
B
A
R
«
About this website

SydWalker.Info is a personal website. I live in tropical Australia near Cairns. I oppose war, plutocracy, injustice, sectarian supremacism and apartheid. I support urgent action to achieve genuine sustainability and a fair and prosperous society for all. I rely upon - and support - free speech as defined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (see below).

with the dawg

"Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers"

Blog Issues

Unless otherwise indicated, material on this website is written by Syd Walker.

Anyone is welcome to re-publish material sourced from this site, as long as the source is acknowledged with a hyperlink.

Material from other sources reproduced here is presented on a 'Fair Use' basis. I try to cite references accurately. Please contact me if you have queries, comments, broken link reports, complaints - or just to say hello.

Boycott Apartheid!
Boycott
Category Cloud
Warning: max(): When only one parameter is given, it must be an array in /home/sydwalki/public_html/blog/wp-content/plugins/widget-category-cloud/category-cloud.php on line 141

Warning: min(): When only one parameter is given, it must be an array in /home/sydwalki/public_html/blog/wp-content/plugins/widget-category-cloud/category-cloud.php on line 141


Warning: asort() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /home/sydwalki/public_html/blog/wp-content/plugins/widget-category-cloud/category-cloud.php on line 154

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /home/sydwalki/public_html/blog/wp-content/plugins/widget-category-cloud/category-cloud.php on line 164

RSS RSS Feed
May 2017
S M T W T F S
« Dec    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
Search this website
The Great Flood of Sex-Negatives
December 5th, 2008 by Syd Walker


Warning: mysql_num_fields() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/sydwalki/public_html/blog/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 3096

Dr Michael Flood of Wollongong UniversityIt must be awful to be important enough to be in Wikipedia.

Imagine being at the mercy of a pack of largely anonymous editors (some of them spooks?) who can – and often do – perform the most comprehensive character assassination imaginable on hapless victims who have little or no chance of redress.

For that reason, Dr Michael Flood of Wollongong University has my sympathies. Even though his role in promoting Internet censorship disgusts me (Flood has collaborated closely with prominent pro-censorship ‘intellectual’ Clive Hamilton on that issue), I wouldn’t wish a dud entry in Wikipedia on anyone.

But I have a little gratuitous advice for Dr Flood. Even though he seems to churn out academic papers at a furious rate, he might take time off from his frantic schedule to sort out his Wikipedia entry, if he can.

The entry for Dr Michael Flood, dated December 4th, 2008 makes him seem rather foolish (emphases added):

Michael Flood is an Australian sociologist. His research includes work in men’s studies, a field which formed largely in response to [citation needed], and as a critique of [citation needed], an emerging men’s rights movement. Flood’s research focuses on men, heterosexuality, interpersonal violence, and gender and gender-related topics.

Flood is the coordinator of a pro-feminist website, XYonline, that provides a range of commentary and research on men and masculinities, male sexuality, gender feminism, violence perpetrated by males, and the men’s movement from a gender feminist perspective. He received a PhD in Gender and Sexuality Studies from the Australian National University (ANU) in 2001.

Flood opposes sex-positive feminism[1], men’s rights[2], and father’s rights.[3]

He is currently a lecturer in Sociology at the University of Wollongong. Previously he was a Postdoctoral fellow at La Trobe University’s “Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society”, conducting research on the sexual and reproductive health of young heterosexual men.

Bob Katter MPOn the principle that the best antidote to convoluted nonsense may be an equal and opposite force of incorrigible anti-intellectualism, I think I’ll forward this to Bob Katter and see what happens.

Here’s my suggested Questions in The House (sadly they must await the new Parliamentary year):

Is the Prime Minister aware that one of the foremost proponents of his compulsory Internet censorship scheme is an academic who, according to Wikipedia, opposes both men’s rights and father’s rights?

Does the Government fund Dr Flood’s academic pursuits, given that he is apparently hostile to at least half the human species?

How can the Rudd Government justify associating with Dr Flood, given it’s supposed commitment to ‘working families’?

Does the Government favor only single-parent or lesbian working families?

Follow-up question:

Does the Government agree with Dr Flood that sex-positive feminists should be opposed – and does it have a policy of positive discrimination in favour of sex-negative feminists?

____________________________________________

POSTSCRIPT

The most interesting pages in Wikipedia are often the ‘Discussion’ pages. Each entry (eg. Michael Flood) has a front page which is what you usually view. But at the top of that page are a few tabs. One says ‘Discussion’. Click that tab to see what discussion – if any – has ensued over the main entry.

Some discussion pages are lengthy and reflect extended debates between editors. In other cases, there’s no discussion at all. Michael Flood’s discussion entry is not null, but it is very short. Someone asks whether Dr Flood is truly notable enough to be in Wikipedia and seeks a secondary source to prove it.

I can help out there. This ‘secondary source’ affirms that Dr Flood is indeed ‘notable’. I’d say he’s notorious. He definitely merits an entry in Wikipedia – and if anyone ever starts a rival called ‘Dikipedia’, he should probably be in that too.

________________

UPDATE (June 6th 2009):  Furher to the comments on this article by Dr Flood and myself dated December 2008, there’s a significant article in New Matilda – see ‘Net Nanny’ Advocate Does Back Flip by Rachel Maher.

Dr Flood notes what he perceives to be dangers of compulsory Internet censorship:

I am much more convinced of its technological problems and I am much more convinced of its political dangers

It’s a welcome clarification, for which Michael Flood should be congratulated.


No Responses  
  • Michael Flood writes:
    December 31st, 20088:21 pmat

    Yes, it’s annoying stuff. Someone else created the Wikipedia entry on me, I heard about it, and I occasionally update or correct it. The most frequent edits are by anti-feminist advocates who want to paint me as anti-male. But recently, someone is persisting in describing me as ‘opposed to sex-positive feminism’. That’s just inaccurate. I’m certainly critical of aspects of some libertarian critiques of censorship, and I’m also deeply critical of moral conservative advocacy of censorship, and more widely, passionately supportive of feminism and queer rights. Anyway, I just hope that people read past the insulting and inaccurate descriptions and look at what I’ve actually written.
    Cheers,
    michael flood.

      

    • WTurner67 writes:
      November 26th, 201012:57 pmat

      It is interesting that Michael is clearly and some may say intentionally blind to the double standard and lack of balance in his writing of the emotional experience between the genders. Nor has he responded to letters to him on the topic. He openly advocates for the recognition of inequity of any feminist perspective, which is by any measure an honorable task. However his lack of balance and perspective in his work clearly lacks the same equity principles for his own gender when he actively denigrates and denounces the men’s movement for doing the same for hurt or broken men. One can only speculate as to why Michael maintains such a loss of balance, compassion or empathy and credibility towards his socio-sexist myopia which has no place in the balanced research of observing, reporting or policy acvice in academia.

        

  • Michael Flood writes:
    December 31st, 20088:21 pmat

    Yes, it’s annoying stuff. Someone else created the Wikipedia entry on me, I heard about it, and I occasionally update or correct it. The most frequent edits are by anti-feminist advocates who want to paint me as anti-male. But recently, someone is persisting in describing me as ‘opposed to sex-positive feminism’. That’s just inaccurate. I’m certainly critical of aspects of some libertarian critiques of censorship, and I’m also deeply critical of moral conservative advocacy of censorship, and more widely, passionately supportive of feminism and queer rights. Anyway, I just hope that people read past the insulting and inaccurate descriptions and look at what I’ve actually written.
    Cheers,
    michael flood.

      

  • Syd Walker writes:
    December 18th, 20085:09 amat

    It has come to my attention that Michael Flood may not be an advocate of the Australian Government’s Internet censorship proposal any longer.

    The following is an extract from a comment posted by Dr Flood to the EFA’s stop-censorship mailing list.

    > I haven’t been participating in recent debates about porn and filtering,
    > mainly because I simply don’t have time. But also because I’m less
    > convinced of the merits of filtering, on both political and
    > technological grounds, than I was in the past.

    If this reflects Dr Flood’s current views it represents a welcome change of heart.

      

  • Syd Walker writes:
    December 18th, 20085:09 amat

    It has come to my attention that Michael Flood may not be an advocate of the Australian Government’s Internet censorship proposal any longer.

    The following is an extract from a comment posted by Dr Flood to the EFA’s stop-censorship mailing list.

    > I haven’t been participating in recent debates about porn and filtering,
    > mainly because I simply don’t have time. But also because I’m less
    > convinced of the merits of filtering, on both political and
    > technological grounds, than I was in the past.

    If this reflects Dr Flood’s current views it represents a welcome change of heart.

      


Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

»  Substance:WordPress   »  Style:Ahren Ahimsa