With the dust of 9-11 long-settled – the drama of that day now nine years in the past – things become clearer.
Dr Niels Harrit: a latter-day Copernicus
We live in a world of two principal political paradigms, locked in competition.
One paradigm attempts to explain the most crucial event in recent history with an open mind.
It concludes that the 9-11 atrocities could not have been carried out, as alleged, by marginalised terrorists on the fringe of power.
Consideration of a single aspect of 9-11 alone – the collapse of the THREE world trade centre towers – leads any open minded observer, once appraised of the basic facts, to conclude the official narrative is bogus.
The almost inevitable conclusion to be drawn by such an intelligent open-minded observer, once persuaded that 9-11 was carried out by perpetrators other than ’19 Islamic extremists’, is that agents of the State of Israel played the crucial role in perpetrating the 9-11 atrocity.
As in many a classic whodunit novel, the main accuser turns out to be the villain all along. The first-accused were victims of a frame-up. In the language of our era, 9-11 was a ‘false-flag’ operation: a Zionist false-flag operation.
The other paradigm is that the 9-11 Commission was broadly correct, that the collapsed World Trade Centre buildings fell as a result of fuel fires triggered by plane crashes into the twin towers – and that the perpetrators of the attacks were indeed Islamic extremists, members of an organisation called ‘Al Qaida’ under the direction of a villainous Islamic extremist, Osama Bin Laden.
This second paradigm continues to enjoy overwhelming support within the mainstream media and mainstream political discourse. It had that advantage from the day of the attacks.
It underpins a raft of policies rolled out over the last none years that, according to the first paradigm, are based in an inherently false premise. These falsehood-based policies include several wars launched in the middle east (Afghanistan and Iraq being the two major and ongoing wars), massive expansion in western military, ‘security’ and ‘intelligence’ budgets and draconian anti-civil liberties laws in many parts of the world including ‘the west’.
There have been occasional ‘break outs’, when a media personality has gone public with doubts about the official version of 9-11. In the USA, popular chat-show presenter and former member of The View team Rosie MacDonnell is probably the most famous example. Other less talented and resilient members of the media will doubtless have noted her fate. Rosie is no longer on The View.
For the most part, the media has simply not reported the existence of doubt about the official version of 9-11. Such reportage that has been done has typically implied that doubters – often sneeringly called ’9-11 Truthers’ – constitute a pathological oddity, akin to a cult believing in green pixies.
This has been an effective means of manipulating and mid-directing mass opinion – to a point. In some regions such as the Middle East, it appears to have failed. Almost a majority of people in Egypt, according to a poll reported in 2008, believe 9-11 was a Zionist false-flag operation. Perhaps not accidentally, President Obama launched his new initiative towards the Islamic world speech in Cairo and made a point of affirming the official narrative of 9-11 in his speech.
World Opinion Poll on responsibility for 9-11: September 2008
The same opinion poll indicated a very significant number of people in the USA and Europe who doubted the official account of 9-11, but who did not assign primary responsibility to Israel.
This indicates that the line is barely holding. The old paradigm (which is blind to the key role of Israel in perpetuating 9-11) is losing firm believers. Directly after 9-11, I doubt that more than a handful of Americans would have believed 9-11 was a Zionist plot. Even legendary anti-Zionist journalists such as Michael Collins Piper believed – for some considerable time – that 9-11 was a genuine case of ‘blow-back’ in which radical anti-Zionist Muslims had finally struck back against the USA with devastating effect.
The unravelling of the official narrative of 9-11 is a fascinating story. It has been littered with set-backs, many caused by the interference of disinformation agents. In a similar pattern to the aftermath of the JFK assassination, false theories were seeded into the mix, damaging the credibility of the growing network of people determined to establish the truth about 9-11. Other forms of human frailty have played a role as well.
Even so, despite being ignored and/or sneered at by the mainstream media, disregarded by mainstream academia and the publishing industry, overlooked by most politicians and derided by well-funded disinformationalists, the truth is outing. It’s not yet fully distributed – but the network of 9-11 sceptics is surely growing. Within it, the proportion who pin the tail squarely on the donkey and assign primary responsibility to the Israeli regime for the 9-11 attacks is growing too.
A week ago, almost completely ignored by the mainstream media, a modern-day Copernicus visited Australia. His name is Neils Harrit. He’s a Danish scientist with an explosive message – a message grounded in verifiable, peer-reviewed science.
His message is that the WTC towers were blown up with hi-tech explosives, the chemical signature of which he’s analysed along with colleagues. This must have involved lengthy advance preparation. It is inconceivable (and not part of the official narrative) that ‘Islamic extremists’ performed this task.
Dr Harrit does not engage in detailed speculation on who may have been responsible for these controlled demolitions. He sets out the evidence that supports the obvious need for a renewed, honest and transparent inquiry into these world-changing atrocities. But I can be less circumspect. Whoever performed the heinous act of rigging the three WTC towers with high explosives must have done so with the agreement of the leaseholders; at the very least, the authorities should question them first about their involvement and foreknowledge.
Needless to say, the leaseholders of the three WTC towers felled on 9-11 were not Muslims.
The legendary Sherlock Holmes famously remarked: “When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth!” Muslims did not do 9-11 and cover up the crime afterwards. The Vatican was not responsible. This was not the Russians, the Cubans, the French or the Mafia…
One hugely powerful force within American society – and one alone – had the motive, means and opportunity to carry out this crime, with more than a little help from ‘friends’, within the USA and elsewhere. That’s the leadership of the Zionist movement.
Rising awareness of this unpalatable fact is shaking the foundations of the old paradigm. General acceptance of the alternative paradigm, which alone explains the observable facts of 9-11, will change the world forever.
Modern mainstream western culture has become Judeophilic to a degree that it has parted company with reality. It’s built-in pro-Zionist bias is now so extreme that our culture is demonstrably at odds with observable reality.
The mainstream view of 9-11 can persist only through increasingly implausible refusal to revue the evidence with an open mind and consider inconvenient facts. That is no more sustainable than the pre-heliocentric paradigm, once an alternative with greater explanatory power became available.
Attempts to censor contrary views will only make life more untenable for the purveyors of falsehoods; it would fast bring the debate fully into the open. Open scrutiny is the worst nightmare for defenders of the old paradigm.
The days of the Great 21st Century Blood Libel against Islam are numbered.