SIDEBAR
»
S
I
D
E
B
A
R
«
About this website

SydWalker.Info is a personal website. I live in tropical Australia near Cairns. I oppose war, plutocracy, injustice, sectarian supremacism and apartheid. I support urgent action to achieve genuine sustainability and a fair and prosperous society for all. I rely upon - and support - free speech as defined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (see below).

with the dawg

"Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers"

Blog Issues

Unless otherwise indicated, material on this website is written by Syd Walker.

Anyone is welcome to re-publish material sourced from this site, as long as the source is acknowledged with a hyperlink.

Material from other sources reproduced here is presented on a 'Fair Use' basis. I try to cite references accurately. Please contact me if you have queries, comments, broken link reports, complaints - or just to say hello.

Boycott Apartheid!
Boycott
Misc Menu
 
September 2009
S M T W T F S
« Aug   May »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
Search this website
Reality TV: Dr Steven Jones on 9-11 and Nanothemite
September 7th, 2009 by Syd Walker

On April 30th 2009, Dr Steven Jones gave a presentation in Sacramento, California. He discussed recent scientific findings regarding the collapse of three World Trade Center steel-framed tower blocks in New York City on 9-11.

When I watched this lecture on YouTube, I found it occasionally hard to navigate. So I’ve made a list of the 12 segments, in sequence, for viewing convenience.

This is the story the BBC, ABC – and all the rest of the lying western mass media – are doing their best to avoid.

Dr Steven Jones lectures on 9-11 and the use of nanothermite to collapse three towers of thre World Trade Center

Dr Steven Jones lectures on 9-11: he lost his academic job, but retained his integrity

Happily, we don’t have to rely on liars any longer.

Nearly eight years from September 11th 2001, ignorance is no longer an excuse. Those operatives in the mass media who actively continue the 9-11 cover-up must by now be regarded as complicit in this horrible crime.

They will have to live with their own consciences for failing to report accurately on the Crime of the Century.

In a society which took justice seriously they would face criminal charges for conspiring to pervert the course of justice.


9 Responses  
  • Sally writes:
    September 10th, 20091:41 pmat

    From Bill Moyers show on PBS in USA, Sept 2008:

    Michael Reagan, son of the former president, suggested that people who claim that “nine-eleven was an inside job,” a U.S. government conspiracy, deserve to die. “Take them out and shoot them. They are traitors to this country, and shoot them. But anybody who would do that doesn’t deserve to live. You shoot them. You call them traitors, that’s what they are, and you shoot them dead. I’ll pay for the bullet.”

    Guess the following traitors need to run for cover:

    “41 U.S. Counter-Terrorism and Intelligence Agency Veterans Challenge the Official Account of 9/11″ http://patriotsquestion911.com/Counterterrorism_Veterans.html

    University of Toronto, Nov 2008: “Hidden History of 911″ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWLuehicB4g&feature=related

      

          Reply  
  • Sally writes:
    September 10th, 20091:46 pmat

    This from Fox — incredibly:

    Richard Gage on KMPH Fox 26 in Fresno, CA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oO2yT0uBQbM&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fww3zionism.blogspot.com%2F&feature=player_embedded

    I know; I could have used tiny url.

      

          Reply  
  • sentience writes:
    September 17th, 201111:18 amat

    fox news’ owners and a small coterie of key staff are guilty of conspiracy to commit mass murder, not just perversion of the course of justice. as cameraman simonsen says, it was televised, ergo it was for real.

      

          Reply  
    • Peter D writes:
      September 17th, 20118:38 pmat

      You need to put the crack pipe down, sentience.

      The plane that hit the second tower hit on the right hand side of the south(?) face of the tower. If it hit the centre of the tower, it would have then collided with the core structure of the tower – the central elevator group, etc. But because it hit off-centre, it’s forward movement was only impeded by the perimeter columns of the tower, and the floors of the tower. Other than that, once the plane had broken through the windows of the building, the only other thing stopping its forward progress was the windows (and perimeter columns) on the opposite side of the building.

      Even looking at the video you posted, the “nose out” claim is easily identified as a steaming heap of crap. The cloud that appears out of the opposite face of the building is just that – a cloud. It isn’t the intact nose of the plane, it’s simply the debris that made it to the other side of the building.

        

            Reply  
      • sentience writes:
        September 18th, 201111:49 amat

        thanks for the popular mechanics‘ view, with which i’m quite familiar. go boy, go!

          

              Reply  
  • sentience writes:
    September 18th, 20111:04 pmat

    here’s the “dust cloud” for readers to judge whether fox is a reliable source in the 9/11 psy-op (@ 4:22 mark).
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5-xcvv_fRQ

    and whilst it’s interesting to debate by what means the twins came down, at least the digital effects are easily reproducible. so it comes down to whether one believes the networks would be willing to conspire, not whether it’s physically doable. i think they had motive.

      

          Reply  
    • Peter D writes:
      September 18th, 20117:18 pmat

      There are dozens of independent video recordings of the plane hitting the south tower. How can they all be “fakes”?

        

            Reply  
  • sentience writes:
    September 19th, 201112:00 amat

    the late gerard holmgren explains why the video fakery satisfies occam’s razor to a greater extent than real passenger planes.
    http://www.911closeup.com/

    the “independent” filmers offered the networks a chance to distance themselves from material if the public really smelled a rat and wouldn’t buy it.

    the naudets’ film was pure propaganda (even a true believer would cringe at some of the saccharine lines, and de niro dropped out after the first version). their story is the real mystery – who are they? where are they now, were they even french?
    http://www.spingola.com/jules_naudet.htm

      

          Reply  
  • sentience writes:
    September 19th, 20111:55 amat

    when planes with wings almost as wide as a football field fly at 535 mph (!) they create enormous wake vortices, conspicuously absent in the naudets’ plume of smoke.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ys41jnL2Elk

    here are some real planes’ vortices; and much, much smaller planes to boot, going far slower than 535mph, even adjusting for the slow motion filming (1:20 and 2:50).
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fEPL7R8mXmE

    i’m going back to have a suck on the crack-pipe, so i’ll call it a day for a while.

      

          Reply  


Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

»  Substance:WordPress   »  Style:Ahren Ahimsa