Comments on: The Obama Two-Step

By: DavidG.

DavidG. — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 08:13:48 +0000

Alan, you ask where all this is going. Have you looked at a recent photograph of the moon lately?

By: Alan Gresley

Alan Gresley — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 02:05:31 +0000

Hello Syd.

Please watch this video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JpEb9okbTsM

I not a pessimist, I’m a realist. The media trumped the great hope last July when Obama as the then senator voted for retroactive telecomm immunity. It took the Sarah Palin show to make me think that the Republicans are trying their best to kill the Republican vote.

How is it that for the first time in history, a US presidential candidate was able to give the most hyped up speech ever, and in all places Berlin? At this time I was still reading the propagandized media but I will admit that I didn’t listen to the full speech (Part of which is here in my video).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4h-xVn622o

Look at the recent events of this world. North Korea declaring that they are building nuclear bombs. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad being reelected. Pakistan moving ever so slowly to a failed state. These are not random events like the Georgina Russian conflict was no coincidence coinciding with the opening of the Beijing Olympics. Then we have the Global financial crisis.

Where is the movement or trend going?

More importantly, why is the west so scared of the Zionist?

By: Jinjirrie

Jinjirrie — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:29:04 +0000

Ali Abunimah's article in the EI spells out more concerns with Obama's lecture offering what I agree is false hope to the Muslim world.

By: Jinjirrie

Jinjirrie — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 10:55:15 +0000

Can one fight fascism with moderation?

I don’t think so. Obama’s mealy mouthed tentative speech was the mirror of George Bush Snr’s meaningless platitudes on the same subject. I’ll bet pounds to a peanut that Obama, like Bush Snr doesn’t walk the talk. I’ve also got a fair suspicion that Nutanyahoo will start another war as a diversion – anything will be on the table to prevent relinquishing stolen Palestinian land the Israeli elite covet.

Obama has already granted 10 years military aid to the totalitarian Israeli state.

Notice that nowhere in his sermon did he refer to the right of return of Palestinian refugees, nor did he recognise that resisting an oppressor occupier is legal under international law. Abbas, collaborator with Israel, is de facto president only – his term ran out in January and was extended by fiat till next January. He does not have the right to fritter away Palestinian rights. No wonder the US is keen on hurrying negotiations.

A two state farce is, as you point out, unviable. It will cement existing apartheid and privilege – the faux democratic Israeli ‘state’ already controls the important resources and strategic hilltops. And if two states are formed, how long will it be before Israel transfers its Arab citizenry to the newly reformed gulag?

By: mark

mark — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:31:24 +0000

I agree Syd. The jury’s still out on Obama but at this point there’s no real reason to doubt he has good intentions. Dismantling the incredibly destructive present power structure requires more than a mere frontal assault, which could backfire badly. Although it’s still early days, Obama’s Presidency appears to be following a trajectory similar to that of JFK, who grew in leaps and bounds as a global statesman as his Presidency wore on.

And yes, an honest, open inquiry into 9/11 would surely cause the penny to drop for a critical mass of Americans. The western media, which is the public relations embodiment of the global Armaments/Zionist industry alliance, is struggling to forestall such an inquiry by smothering public clamor. Life’s going to get harder still for the western media because of the internet. They must yearn for the pre-internet days. Back then they could say any damm thing they felt like and everyone believed them.