SIDEBAR
»
S
I
D
E
B
A
R
«
About this website

SydWalker.Info is a personal website. I live in tropical Australia near Cairns. I oppose war, plutocracy, injustice, sectarian supremacism and apartheid. I support urgent action to achieve genuine sustainability and a fair and prosperous society for all. I rely upon - and support - free speech as defined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (see below).

with the dawg

"Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers"

Blog Issues

Unless otherwise indicated, material on this website is written by Syd Walker.

Anyone is welcome to re-publish material sourced from this site, as long as the source is acknowledged with a hyperlink.

Material from other sources reproduced here is presented on a 'Fair Use' basis. I try to cite references accurately. Please contact me if you have queries, comments, broken link reports, complaints - or just to say hello.

Boycott Apartheid!
Boycott
Misc Menu
January 2009
S M T W T F S
« Dec   Feb »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
Search this website
Laughing at the Warren Commission
Jan 31st, 2009 by Syd Walker

Kevin Costner in JFK

DA Jim Garrison demonstates the magic bullet absurdity in the movie 'JFK'

I spotted the highly recommended video featured lower down in this article – Back and to the Left – at Suraci’s blog. View it there to watch it alongside footage of the shooting of President John. F. Kennedy.

The comedian, Bill Hicks, had a meteoric career, tragically cut short by cancer in his early 30s over ten years ago. At the time Hicks gave this perfomance, Oliver Stone’s 1991 movie JFK was fresh in many peoples’ minds.

“Back and to the left” were the words used by Kevin Costner, who played District Attorney Jim Garrison, to describe the motion of Kennedy’s head as he was shot on that fateful day in November 1963. This made it obvious to anyone with a brain that Oswald could not have fired the lethal shot from the Book Depository. A ‘magic bullet’ was invented by the Warren Commission to explain away the inconvenient truth.

The young lawyer working for the Warren Commission back in 1964, who invented the absurd ‘magic bullet’ theory, went by the name Arlen Specter. Today, Arlen Specter is the senior Senator for Pennsylvania.

In the immortal words of Sir John Harrington:

Treason doth never prosper, what’s the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it Treason.

To see more of Bill Hicks’ brilliance, check out his website or look him up on YouTube. The atheistic Beyond the Fringe website today has an article Devastation is the Bible’s Fault, which features a Hicks skit about the war-mongering hypocrisy of some ‘Christians’.

Not much has changed on that front since the early 1990s.

Yad Kennedy: A Wreath to George Washington?
Jan 31st, 2009 by Syd Walker

Readers of this blog will know that I share the view of a growing number of people that that President John F. Kennedy was murdered in a conspiracy that was subsequently covered up.

Some years ago, after reading Final Judgment by Michael Collins Piper, I was persuaded that the mystery is essentially solved. Rightly or wrongly, I now believe that the ultimate perpetrators – the people who organized the assassination and cover-up – were leading figures in the Zionist movement, not only within the USA but elsewhere including Israel.

Yad Kennedy, Jerusalem

Yad Kennedy, Jerusalem

I’ve written about this previously – and encourage anyone interested to read a paper written by Mike Piper, available on this website.

Now here’s a minor footnote to the saga. Situated near Jerusalem is Yad Kennedy, a memorial to the slain US President. Built in 1966 with funds donated by Jewish communities in the USA, it’s certainly a striking monument. It also has interesting symbolism that’s clearly the product of some consideration. According to NationMaster.com:

Yad Kennedy is a memorial to John F. Kennedy, near Jerusalem. It consists of a 60-foot-high memorial is in the shape of a cut tree trunk, symbolizing a life cut short. Inside is a bust of John F. Kennedy, the President of the United States who was assassinated in 1963. The mountaintop memorial is encircled by 51 columns, each bearing the emblem of a state of the Union, plus the District of Columbia. It was built in 1966 with funds donated by Jewish communities in the USA. John Fitzgerald Kennedy (May 29, 1917 – November 22, 1963), also referred to as John F. Kennedy, JFK, John Kennedy, or Jack Kennedy, was the 35th President of the United States.

It was designed by the Israeli sculptor Dov Feigon, the circular hall is divided into sections for each of the states of USA and the official emblem of a different state appears on the window on each section:

State Seals on the Yad Lennedy memorial

State Seals on the Yad Lennedy memorial

The symbolism of 51 columns got my attention. I understand the number represents 50 US States plus the District of Columbia. Even so, why make such a fuss about DC in this monument? It’s a rather unusual stroke.

After all, back in the 1960s. DC had no Congressional representative. If the intent was to be fully inclusive, what about Guam, Puerto Rico and American Samoa?

Anyhow, as each column bears the seal of a US state, preumably the 51st column displays the District of Columbia seal?

District of Columbia Seal

District of Columbia Seal

I haven’t found an online photo of this at Yad Kennedy, but I did locate an image of the District of Columbia seal. Apparently it depicts Justice laying a wreath at a statue of George Washington.

Is any of this significant? Perhaps not. Just ‘conspiracy theory’ mumbo jumbo…

After all, any implication that Israel symbolically granted itself the rank of a US State is clearly inaccurate. If Israel was a US State, it would have to pay its way.

Last word to George Washington, who remarked in his farewell address:

So likewise, a passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite nation of privileges denied to others which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions; by unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained, and by exciting jealousy, ill-will, and a disposition to retaliate, in the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld. And it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens (who devote themselves to the favorite nation), facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own country, without odium, sometimes even with popularity; gilding, with the appearances of a virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable zeal for public good, the base or foolish compliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation.

George Washington

George Washington: warned against bias towards any foreign interests

Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me, fellow-citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake, since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government. But that jealousy to be useful must be impartial; else it becomes the instrument of the very influence to be avoided, instead of a defense against it. Excessive partiality for one foreign nation and excessive dislike of another cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people, to surrender their interests.

Peres: How to Lose Friends & Infuriate People
Jan 31st, 2009 by Syd Walker

Shimon Peres at Davos, 2009

Sir Shimon Peres, Grand Master of the Endlessly Unsuccessful 'Peace Process'

The recent debate at Davos – Gaza: the case for Middle East peace ran for just over an hour (watch it below).

Shortly before the end, Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan quit the stage in reaction to what he considered insulting behavior by the moderator, the Washington Post’s David Ignatius. The latter, whose kid-glove treatment of Shimon Peres was embarrassing to behold,  seemed more concerned about getting to dinner on time than facilitating free discussion on matters of life and death.

Paul Woodward, who writes for the War in Context website, argues in Barbarism Unmasked that the widely-reported spat at the end of the debate indicates a more fundamental shift:

Yesterday’s session… was a pivotal moment in political discourse between the West and the rest of the world. The self-righteous hubris of an enraged Israeli president collided with the outrage of those who refused to ignore his bloodied hands.

The disconnect between the sanctimonious, dissembling clap-trap presented by Israeli President Shimon Peres and the glaring realities of Israel’s recent assault on Gaza was too much for the Turkish PM. He’s not just a hero to his own people for speaking out. Peres – and Israel – are increasingly too much for the world as a whole. To articulate this in a public forum is to speak for the many, not just for a few.

George Bush, War Criminal

George Bush, War Criminal

Still, there’s cause for cheer. Remember how things were half a year ago? The last time the Davos set got together, George Bush was US President. His speech at Sharm El Sheikh was arguably a more condescending load of bull than Peres just served up. Read this report to understand why they’d kept the former President away until then. If he’d showed up at Davos this time, Bush might have been pelted with Gucci shoes.

An interesting twist to the Davos debate on Gaza is discussed on the Turkish Forum. It notes a sudden change in the reported background of moderator David Ignatius in Wikipedia, following the debate on January 29th 2009, which Wikirage appears to confirm. The Turkish forum quotes from Ignatius’ entry, both before and after the Davos furore went global:

BEFORE

David R. Ignatius (born May 26, 1950), an Jewish-American journalist and novelist. As of 2008, he is an associate editor and columnist for The Washington Post. He also co-hosts PostGlobal, an online discussion of international issues at Washingtonpost.com, with Newsweek ’s Fareed Zakaria.

AFTER

David Ignatius

David Ignatius, Moderator from Hell

David R. Ignatius (May 26, 1950), an American journalist and novelist of Armenian descent[1][2]. As of 2008, he is an associate editor and columnist for The Washington Post. He also co-hosts PostGlobal, an online discussion of international issues at Washingtonpost.com, with Newsweek ’s Fareed Zakaria.

__________________________________________

The two references cited to his ‘Armenian’ heritage do seem to check out. Of course, it’s entirely possible Ignatius has Armenian and Jewish heritage. Who knows? Who cares?

Apparently someone does. As always with Wikipedia, pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!

Latest from Davos
Jan 31st, 2009 by Syd Walker

Davos 2009

The Quest for Economic Consensus

»  Substance:WordPress   »  Style:Ahren Ahimsa