SIDEBAR
»
S
I
D
E
B
A
R
«
About this website

SydWalker.Info is a personal website. I live in tropical Australia near Cairns. I oppose war, plutocracy, injustice, sectarian supremacism and apartheid. I support urgent action to achieve genuine sustainability and a fair and prosperous society for all. I rely upon - and support - free speech as defined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (see below).

with the dawg

"Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers"

Blog Issues

Unless otherwise indicated, material on this website is written by Syd Walker.

Anyone is welcome to re-publish material sourced from this site, as long as the source is acknowledged with a hyperlink.

Material from other sources reproduced here is presented on a 'Fair Use' basis. I try to cite references accurately. Please contact me if you have queries, comments, broken link reports, complaints - or just to say hello.

Boycott Apartheid!
Boycott
Misc Menu
December 2008
S M T W T F S
« Nov   Jan »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
Search this website
Having Fun Falsifying History
December 8th, 2008 by Syd Walker

One thing’s for sure.

By the time the campaign to stop Internet censorship in Australia is over, millions of Australians will know a lot more about Adolf Hitler. At least, they’ll think they do.

Adolf HitlerIf you’re followed the campaign, here’s a Hitler quotation you may well have encountered already, possibly more than once.

The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation.

When today I search Google for that exact text, using inverted commas (“ ”) to enclose the entire text string – then repeat the search with the omitted results included – Goggle returns no less than 1,210 results. That’s more than a thousand webpages containing the exact same quotation, presumably a copy and paste job on each occasion.

If I then repeat the search, looking for the same text in inverted commas AND for the word ‘Conroy’ *the surname of Australia’s pro-censorship Communications Minister), today I get 214 results. If I search for the same text AND for ‘internet’ AND ‘australia’, I get 424 results. It’s reasonable to infer that close to half the repetitions of this Hitler quotation (in English) on the World Wide Web occur in the context of Australia’s Internet censorship debate.

Adolf Hitler’s rather menacing remarks are sometimes directly attributed to Mein Kampf, his mid-1920s biography and call to action. They certainly seem to have captured the imagination of campaigners.

It’s been like a lot of lightbulbs switching on around Australia, in rapid succession. Say what! Crafty old Hitler was onto the exact same scam! Now the Rudd Government is behaving like Nazis. Shame, shame on them!

There’s just one little problem with this alarming narrative. Hitler never actually said those words.

At least, he DID write in Mein Kampf (English Translation): “The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people.”

That’s the kind of thing politicians often do say. He also, incidently, went on to write some things related to eugenics that are controversial. It’s not hard to find real quotes in Mein Kampf that can be construed as unsavoury and unpleasant.

But this isn’t one of them. The rest of the quotation is not in Mein Kampf at all. If someone can prove me wrong on this, please do, citing an exact page reference.

Rabbi Daniel LapinAs far as I can tell, the rest of the paragraph was invented by an imaginative Rabbi in early 2004.

In fairness, Rabbi Daniel Lapin didn’t set out to deceive his readers. His essay was clearly an account of his own fantasy. He was telling a tale.

He wrote: “I thought it might be interesting to explore what Adolf Hitler himself might have thought about Move On’s derangement.”

Lapin then quoted from imaginary correspondence from Hitler, including contemporary references. The Rabbi’s main purpose seems to have been supporting the Bush Administration’s ‘War on Terror’.

The deceivers in this case – whether they do it intentionally or not – are people who repeat this quotation, wrongly attributing all of it to Hitler instead of giving due credit to the invented ‘enhancements’ added by Rabbi Lapin.

For some reason, this mainly-bogus quotation is being passed around the Australian anti-censorship campaign like a popular talisman. I wonder why?

It may well be an ‘innocent’ mistake, like the contagious mass hallucinations reported during the Salem witch trials. Alternatively or in addition, some folk may be busily priming the pump for reasons best known to themselves. There are SO MANY instances of the quote that an ‘accident theory’ seems implausible as a complete explanation. On a quick scan, it appears that most instances of this hoax quotation are posted as comments to other articles. The comments are often anonymous.

Of course, some people may take the position that it really doesn’t matter exactly what Hitler said, because (a) he is long dead and (b) he was a very, very, very bad man.

I suppose there’s nothing wrong with believing in factally inaccurate myths, as long as there’s no attempt to impose them on others.

In any case, it’s hard to beat fantasists, so I think I’ll join them.

Jo StalinHere’s a remark I imagine Jospeh Stalin might well have made to the Politburo in closed session. It’s absolutely authentic – direct from my vivid imagination:

“We frequently speak of the welfare of children, but this is merely a feint. Our real goal is enslavement of the adult masses. Once we can monitor the writings and reading material of the nation, we shall have absolute ideological control. We must await the necessary technological developments, but when the time comes we will smash our enemies and impose an era of absolute rule that will last 1,000 years.”

- Jo Stalin (Speech to the USSR Politburo, 1948)

There! What do you think about that? Shocking, isn’t it! Those rotten Stalinists in Canberra! (If you don’t like it, incidentally, just invent your own)

I must remember to check back on Google next week to see if that quote gets traction.

Winston ChurchillVerballing these long-deceased individuals is such good fun, I think I’ll conclude with something Winston Churchill may well have said. It’s also 100% invented and suitable for immediate recycling:

“Our stated goals in fighting two bloody world wars were democracy and freedom. But that, of course, was only window-dressing for the public. Our real goal is a great western alliance, supported by the most sophisticated propaganda system in the history of mankind, that will conquer the world through military might and maintain the privilege of the Anglophile pro-Zionist ruling elite while enforcing bondage on all others. It is vital that the public’s telecommunications are meticulously ‘filtered’ so resistance to our evil plans can be eradicated.”

– Winston S. Churchill, Un-Declassified Memo to President Roosevelt, 1941


9 Responses  
  • keza writes:
    December 8th, 20084:02 pmat

    I enjoyed this. Thanks.

    Most of what leaders have said historically (and what they say in the present) needs to be seen as spin. However, that’s not enough. Even when we can discern the hypocrisy, a decision about whether to support or oppose the policies of one side or another, requires us to focus on the likely outcome. Your “quote” from Churchill is interesting in this respect. He would never have actually said that of course, but we know that he was in fact motivated, (at bottom) by the interests of British imperialism. Nevertheless as far as WW2 was concerned, siding with Churchill over Chamberlain was necessary. Chamberlain’s appeasement policy would have produced a far worse outcome. And in the end it is outcome which counts.

    I supported the US overthrow of Saddam Hussein for that reason. I didn’t believe it was really about weapons of mass destruction at all. For various reasons (which I don’t have space/timeto outline in a simple comment), I believed that in the case of Iraq, US policy was driven by a recognition that a democracy in Iraq (rather than a US puppet) was in its interests.

    Despite the death toll, I continue to believe that the outcome in Iraq will be (already is) an infant democracy, and that if the fascist regime there had been left alone, the coming years would have seen the implosion of the regime, followed by the sort of blood bath that I don’t even want to imagine.

    That doesn’t mean that I just believe US rhetoric. One takes sides on the basis of likely outcome, which requires making an effort to work out where history is headed.

  • Syd Walker writes:
    December 9th, 20081:19 amat

    Thanks for your comment keza, although I could scarcely disagree more.

    Condoleezza Rice seems to be on the same wavelength as you are. She regards Iraq as a Strategic Achievement

    Regarding World War Two, what ‘far worse outcome’ do you have in mind, I wonder?

    The actual outcome – ~60 million dead – seems a rather bad outcome to me.

    • Sven writes:
      July 10th, 201012:45 pmat

      Syd Walker: I’m guessing the ‘far worse outcome’ would be a few billion dead, such as the majority of non-Aryan peoples.

  • Jinjirrie writes:
    December 9th, 20081:57 amat

    Arrghh … erroneous quote (which was obtained from Wikipedia as I recall) redacted from my site – thanks for the sleuthing.

  • Mr. Anon writes:
    December 10th, 200811:28 amat

    hey mate, thanks for your article.

    i’m a closet ww2 history studier, just fascinates me and i love reading about it, all of it, every tidbit…

    anyways, i tried to reference the hitler quote to an online copy of mein kampf…

    nada.

    thanks for your article, i’m glad to see some people are on the ball :)

    big respect.

  • Colin Jacobs writes:
    December 24th, 20099:27 amat

    But didn’t (imaginary) Franklin D. Roosevelt say:

    “We hold these things sacred and inviolable. The right to choose our leaders; to determine the direction of our own future; and to say what we please, how we please, without fear of government sanction. If, in the struggle to preserve these holy liberties, excesses and misquotations occur, then we repent of them – but only when the battle is ultimately won.” – F. D. Roosevelt, Fireside Chat, May 22 1943

    So, according to imaginary Roosevelt, it’s ok to use the quote from fictional Hitler.

    • Syd Walker writes:
      August 1st, 20107:59 pmat

      I love that one Colin. Missed it at the time.

      Someone should set up a website for bogus historical quotations and encourage contributions. Ther’s a lot of talent out there :-)

  • Republican Nate Bell adornes facebook page with fabricated Hitler quote « Arkansas Media Watch writes:
    July 26th, 20118:25 amat

    […] Much more widespread was propaganda based on national security, racial fears, and family values. 2. The alleged Hitler quote is a fabrication. Not of Bell’s making, heaven forbid – he just copied and pasted it from one of […]

  • Davis Thompson writes:
    January 18th, 20133:27 amat

    I have to say, I felt that quote was too good to be true. Bought a copy of Mein Kampf for Kindle and couldn’t find it, either.

    Well done.


Leave a Reply

http://sydwalker.info/blog/2008/12/08/having-fun-falsifying-history/You must be logged in to post a comment.

»  Substance:WordPress   »  Style:Ahren Ahimsa